Showing posts with label punch and judy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label punch and judy. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 15

Punch in New York

 written and illustrated by
Alice Provensen
Viking  1991


When the star of a famed Italian puppet theatre is stolen fro his owner he goes on a mischievous romp through modern day New York City only to realize there's no place like home... unless you get to rip off someone in the process.

Landing in New York, Il Professore Tucci-Piccini (all Punch puppeteers are referred to as Professor) has one of his bags stolen from him, the one containing his star, Mr. Punch. Back at the thieves den when they discover the suitcase is not full of money they toss Punch out of the window where he lands on a baker in the street and sets of on his very Punch-like adventure across the city. After a couple of isolated incidents Punch falls in with a pack of muggers and quickly becomes their leader, convincing them to help him steal the car of a wealthy man and driving it – preposterously across the roofs of buildings – to his home. Lauded for his excellent driving Punch is hired on as the regular chauffeur but he becomes lonely for his old family, the puppet theatre, and in the end manages to combine his old and new jobs into one sweet deal.

Punch has always been a bad boy, and his antics have always been enjoyed for their outrageousness. In updating the Punch tale, Provensen has found ways to incorporate some of the standby characters – policeman and alligator – in a way very much in keeping with modern times. Other, trickier characters such as the beadle, the devil, the hangman, and even Judy and the baby are sidelined probably because of how quickly they would become hot-button problems if introduced. In the traditional play Punch is a serial murderer and clearly that wouldn't do for a picture book. Instead, Provensen gives us a Punch without his historical trappings but with plenty of bad behavior that walks the tightrope between playful and dangerous.

Provensen's illustrations sit like stacks of multiple planes, almost naive in perspective. The large city scenes are crowded with textual details, names of stores and signs and places that suggest that nothing in New York is real unless it has a name attached to it. Some of the businesses are real (the Waldorf) while the rich man named Helmstrump seems an amalgam of Helmsley and Trump and his name appears on buildings throughout. It's difficult to know if Provensen is going for commentary or providing adults with an inside joke and I'm not quite sure it works either way. But the color palate of oil paint on velum is bright and bold

The historical origins of a Punch and Judy puppet show go pack to the 16th century Italian commedia dell'arte where a set of stock characters would perform farces that openly mocked the morality of decent people. Punch, a hunchbacked hooked-nosed dwarf, was an obnoxious braggart, a violent drunkard, and a coward who settled every disagreement with a paddle that was larger than himself. He would beat police and church figures, outwit the devil, and got away with murder, literally. The no one in their right mind would cheer for such a person in real life. This puppet surrogate allowed audiences to laugh at the folly of the bad guy getting away with it.

And I feel the need to interject here that this desire to root for the bad guy exists to this day in modern entertainment. We like to imagine ourselves getting away with it, yet at the same time feel relief in seeing the lawbreakers get caught or killed. It feeds our fantasies and then calms our sense of morality, but this need of a moral coda is a modern desire; we have come to a place where we would feel guilty without an explicit ending that the bad guys didn't get away with it, unable to allow our sense of morality rest unspoken. In that way we have become rather weak (or at least lazy) as a society when it comes to using our intellect while enjoying entertainment.

I mention this because the reason I had to check this book out was that someone pointed out a couple of bad reviews on this book on Amazon. I am beginning to believe that comments and product reviews on websites are proof of our failures in education and that they represent 90% of the population.  That aside, I was astonished (I shouldn't have been) that someone thought this book taught bad values ("values" being a the operative word that told me all I needed to know about the commenter) and two of the three reviewers felt the book should be banned. The one who complained about the values even suggested people not buy this "book" (the word book in quotes) as if somehow disagreeing with its content made it less of a book than one they agreed with.

Yes, I can see how if you believed that puppets could come to life, talk to people, drive cars around town, and generally create mischief, that you might believe the book is a deliberate attempt to teach young readers how to lie, cheat and steal. If you cannot tell the difference between a drawing of a fictitious character in a picture book and real people in the world – and worse, if you do not know how to have a conversation with your children to help them understand the differences between what is real and what isn't – then you have a bigger problem than can be solved by banning books. I don't think you need to be cultured in a way that you understand the history of Italian commedia and English puppet theatre in order to understand this book, but if you have a problem with this book then you're also going to have a hard time with gangster movies, with the moral ambiguities of James Bond, even with cute little picture books with talking animals in it; I can think of no greater lie than teaching kids animals can think, behave, and reason just like them.  I realize some people take the bible literally, as is their right to do so, but to apply that same standard to all books is to suggest that all fiction is real or that there's no difference between made-up stories and those in the bible.

Come on, is this really the state of our educational system today?

Is Punch in New York a great book? No, but it is a fine introduction to a classic buffoon from another time and place, where the people weren't so smart that they were offended by a broad farce.

Wednesday, October 28

Punch and the Magic Fish (with video bonus)


A Grimm Brothers' Tale Retold
by Emanuele Luzzati
Pantheon / Random House 1973

Luzzati's retelling of the Grimm's "The Fisherman and His Wife" get overlaid with the Punch and Judy comedy of the hapless hunchback and his shrew of a wife. Not as opulent as some of Luzatti's other illustrations, the story melds the two stories fairly well until the end when it veers a little and the magic fish from the original ends up in the frying pan.

I've done coverage on the original Grimm story long ago when I was doing that sort of thing more often with my Grimmoire series. Basically, Punch the fisherman finds a fish who, in exchange for his freedom, grants the fisherman a wish. His wife Judy sends him back repeatedly to upgrade the wishes even though Punch is perfectly happy with his life at every stage of the story. Finally the wife goes one wish too far and the fish returns them back to their poor life with a family of hungry kids.

Luzatti is usually very bold with his colors, but here everything is set against open fields of white and it doesn't work for me the way his other books do. Still, the mix of torn paper collage and sketchy marker give it that whimsy that I like about his work.

As an added bonus, I was able to find a video Luzzati made around the same time that features Punch and the music of Rossini. It isn't "The Fisherman and his Wife" but it shows another side of this illustrator's work. The darker elements of a traditional Punch and Judy story are here - the beatings, Punch's journey to hell - but I think this could still work for kids today. Some kids. Anyway, enjoy.

Sunday, April 8

Grimmoire 15: Hansel and Gretel

Whenever you reread a familiar story it's the details that tend to stand out. On first brush the details are part of the fabric of the whole, the bits and pieces you put together to make a whole image in your head. Later you see that the things you forgot add an interesting flavor to the memories.

Famine would have been a very realy fear for people and here runs front and center. Famine has forced Hansel and Gretel's parents to a drastic plan: lead the children into the woods and ditch them. Of course, whenever parents consider such dastardly things it means one parent is a step-parent. Guess which, or should I say witch because by now we know that step-mothers are secretly witches (but not true witches as we'll see).

Having heard the plan the children decide they will find a way home. Hansel leaves small pebbles along the road the first time and the parents (well, the step-witch at least) is dismayed at their return. Second time's the charm as they lead the children deeper into the woods and Hansel switches to bread which is eaten by birds. Now truly lost in the woods they stumble upon a house made of bread and cake with sugar glass for windows. Nibble-nibble-nibble and out pops a true witch. How do we know? Because
...witches have red eyes and can't see very far, but they have a keen sense of smell, like animals, and can detect when human beings are near them.
which sounds an awful lot like an albino to me. Seems folk in those days were fearful of things they didn't understand and woe to any child born to be labeled a witch. (And for a more detailed look at the idea behind while albinos are cast as villians in popular culture, check out this article fromPenn State.)

So this particular witch was smart enough to know that during a famine people would be shoving their children into the woods the way some people flush goldfish down the toilet when they tire of them. And she had the resources (being a witch, no doubt, she could conjure them) to build edible houses much like the gingerbread treats children can't resist during the holiday season.

Once lured to the house the witch throws Hansel into a pen for fattening while Gretel has to help with the household duties. The detail here that gets me is that while Hansel feasts and seems unable to use his strength to break out Gretel is fed crab shells. Crab shells. In the middle of the forest. Crab.

How Gretel fools the witch and gains her freedom owes much to the old Punch and Judy plays (that were themselves adapted from the humorous bits of lazzi performed by harlequin, or Arlequino, in 17th century Comedia del Arte). To fool the Hangman, Punch pretends not to understand what he's supposed to do. The Hangman informs him to stick his head in the noose but Punch can't seem to manage until out of frustration the Hangman sticks his head in the noose where Punch kicks the box out from under him and cheats death. Here, Gretel is asking the witch for a demonstration on how Hansel is going into the oven until the witch finally shows here to where Gretel can shove her in and bake her.

The witch dead, Hansel and Gretel ransack the witches house of gems and jewels, find their way home, and return home to their joyful father who, once again, is a widower since the step-mother died.

As a reminder that the Grimm tales came from the oral tradition this one ends with the storyteller's little tag:
My tale is done. See the mouse run. Catch it, whoever can, and then you can make a great big cap out of it's fur.
Not quite Hickory Dickory Dock, but about as meaningful.